MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2755463962 · doi:10.22380/2539472x.118

El territorio como víctima. Ontología política y las leyes de víctimas para comunidades indígenas y negras en Colombia

2017· article· es· W2755463962 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Colombiana de Antropología · 2017
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicConflict, Peace, and Violence in Colombia
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArmed conflictHumanitiesPolitical scienceGeographyPhilosophyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La Ley de Víctimas para pueblos indígenas incluye el reconocimiento del territorio como una víctima más del conflicto armado en Colombia. Haciendo uso de la ontología política como herramienta de análisis, argumento que tal inclusión va más allá de la protección y restitución de derechos de uso y goce de la propiedad colectiva. En su lugar, este reconocimiento puede interpretarse como una oportunidad para pensar una serie de efectos que el conflicto armado ha provocado en conjuntos disímiles de agencias no-humanas que hacen parte sustancial de los territorios de pueblos indígenas y de comunidades negras. El texto explora algunas consecuencias políticas, epistemológicas y ontológicas que pueden derivarse de dicha medida.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.691
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.007
Scholarly communication0.0060.001
Open science0.0050.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.360 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it