MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2756194846 · doi:10.1109/compsac.2017.128

Finding All Breadth First Full Spanning Trees in a Directed Graph

2017· article· en· W2756194846 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGraph Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTree traversalSpanning treeGraph traversalComputer scienceGraphCombinatoricsDirected graphBreadth-first searchKruskal's algorithmDepth-first searchAlgorithmMinimum spanning treeMathematicsTheoretical computer scienceDiscrete mathematicsSearch algorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes an algorithm that is particularly concerned with generating all possible distinct spanning trees that are based on breadth-first-search directed graph traversal. The generated trees span all edges and vertices of the original directed graph. The algorithm starts by generating an initial tree, and then generates the rest of the trees using elementary transformations. It runs in O(E+T) time where E is the number of edges and T is the number of generated trees. In the worst-case scenario, this is equivalent to O (E+En/Nn) time complexity where N is the number of nodes in the original graph. The algorithm requires O(T) space. However, possible modifications to improve the algorithm space complexity are suggested. Furthermore, experiments are conducted to evaluate the algorithm performance and the results are listed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.531
Threshold uncertainty score0.440

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGraph Theory and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207