MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2758109413 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2017.8050818

Scalable memory-less architecture for string matching with FPGAs

2017· article· en· W2758109413 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Packet Processing and Optimization
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceScalabilityParallel computingField-programmable gate arrayThroughputString (physics)Memory architectureContent-addressable memoryRouting tableRouting (electronic design automation)Content-addressable storageString searching algorithmLookup tableComputer hardwareEmbedded systemData structureOperating systemRouting protocol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

String matching hardware engines generally utilize Ternary Content Addressable Memories (TCAMs). Although TCAM-based solutions are fast, they are expensive and power hungry. This paper proposes a high-performance memory-less architecture for string matching called Split-Bucket. It offers a performance comparable to TCAM-based solutions. Moreover, it is reconfigurable and scalable to the size of the target string set and the width of the string. The architecture is characterized using the Longest Prefix Match problem for IP address lookup and is implemented on a Virtex-7 FPGA. For a real-world routing table with 524 k IPv4 prefixes, the Split-Bucket architecture achieves a throughput of 103.4 M packets per second and consumes 23% and 22% of the Look Up Tables and Flip-Flops of a Xilinx XC7V2000T chip, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.514
Threshold uncertainty score0.920

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it