MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W275975031 · doi:10.13182/nse150-155

Parallel Solver Based on the Three-Dimensional Characteristics Method: Design and Performance Analysis

2005· article· en· W275975031 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed Dahmani, Robert J. Le Roy

Bibliographic record

VenueNuclear Science and Engineering · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear reactor physics and engineering
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolverComputer scienceNeutron transportAccelerationComputational scienceParallel computingRay tracing (physics)SoftwareTracingFrame (networking)Applied mathematicsMathematical optimizationNeutronAlgorithmMathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent advances in parallel software development for solving three-dimensional (3-D) neutron transport problems using the characteristics method are presented. The characteristics method solves the transport equation by collecting local angular fluxes along neutron paths. In order to be able to solve large 3-D transport problems in a reasonable time frame, the characteristics solver needs to be accelerated. After applying adequate numerical acceleration techniques, the only issue is to parallelize the solver. The parallelization of this solver is based on distributing a group of tracks, generated by a ray-tracing procedure, on several processors. Different distributing schemes and load-balancing techniques based on a calculation load model are presented. A message-passing model is used to communicate the local solutions between processes participating in solving a problem. Both analytical models of this parallel algorithm and performance analysis are presented and illustrated by several examples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNuclear Science and EngineeringSame topicNuclear reactor physics and engineeringFrench-language works237,207