MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2760103885 · doi:10.1145/3127479.3131623

Latency reduction and load balancing in coded storage systems

2017· article· en· W2760103885 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Data Storage Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceLatency (audio)Erasure codeDistributed data storeLoad balancing (electrical power)Computer networkComputer data storageDistributed computingErasureReal-time computingOperating systemDecoding methodsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Erasure coding has been used in storage systems to enhance data durability at a lower storage overhead. However, these systems suffer from long access latency tails due to a lack of flexible load balancing mechanisms and passively launched degraded reads when the original storage node of the requested data becomes a hotspot. We provide a new perspective to load balancing in coded storage systems by proactively and intelligently launching degraded reads and propose a variety of schemes to make optimal decisions either per request or across requests statistically. Experiments on a 98-machine cluster based on the request traces of 12 million objects collected from Windows Azure Storage (WAS) show that our schemes can reduce the median latency by 44.7% and the 95th-percentile tail latency by 77.8% in coded storage systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.792
Threshold uncertainty score0.278

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Data Storage TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207