On the Interplay Between Network Function Mapping and Scheduling in VNF-Based Networks: A Column Generation Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Middleboxes (i.e., firewall, cache, proxy, etc.) are hardware appliances designed to enforce security and performance policies. Being an integral part of today's cloud and enterprise networks, these middleboxes are expensive, hard to manage and to maintain. Network function virtualization has emerged as a promising technology that replaces these hardware appliances by software ones known as virtual network functions (VNFs). Unlike hardware middleboxes, VNFs can be instantiated and deployed on virtual machines running on commodity servers which ensures their flexibility, manageability, cost-efficiency, and reduce their time-to-market. However, efficiently processing services through an ordered chain of VNFs, called service function chaining (SFC), is not trivial. It requires solving three inter-related sub-problems; the network functions (NFs) mapping sub-problem, the traffic routing sub-problem and the service scheduling sub-problem. This paper first highlights the existing interplay between the three sub-problems and then presents a formulation of the SFC scheduling (SFCS) which exploits interactions between NFs mapping onto VNFs, service scheduling and traffic routing. Given the complexity of the SFCS problem, we present a novel primal-dual decomposition using column generation that solves exactly a relaxed version of the problem and can serve as a benchmark approach. We enhance our solution methodology with a diversification technique to help improve the quality of the obtained solutions. We evaluate numerically our method and show that it can attain optimal solutions substantially faster. Finally, we present several engineering insights for improving the network performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".