MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Discriminative Sparse Features for Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis Using Multimodal Image Data

2017· article· en· W2760607312 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Andrés Ortíz, Francisco Lozano, J. M. Górriz, Javier Ramı́rez, Francisco J. Martínez-Murcia, for the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Alzheimer Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute on AgingCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsDiscriminative modelArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Computer scienceClassifier (UML)Feature extractionDimensionality reductionVoxelContextual image classificationFeature vectorCurse of dimensionalityMachine learningImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Feature extraction in medical image processing still remains a challenge, especially in high-dimensionality datasets, where the expected number of available samples is considerably lower than the dimension of the feature space. This is a common problem in real-world data, and, specifically, in medical image pro- cessing as, while images are composed of hundreds of thousands voxels, only a reduced number of patients are available. OBJECTIVE: Extracting descriptive and discriminative features to represent each sample (image) by a small number of features, which is particularly important in classification task, due to the curse of dimensionality problem. METHODS: In this paper we solve this recognition problem by means of sparse representations of the data, which also provides an arena to multimodal image (PET and MRI) data classification by combining specialized classifiers. Thus, a novel method to effectively combine SVC classifiers is presented here, which uses the distance to the hyperplane computed for each class in each classifier allowing to select the most discriminative image modality in each case. The discriminative power of each modality also provides information about the illness evolution; while functional changes are clearly found in Alzheimer's diagnosed patients (AD) when compared to control subjects (CN), structural changes seem to be more relevant at the early stages of the illness, affecting Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) patients. RESULTS: Classification experiments using 68 CN, 70 AD and 111 MCI images from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative database have been performed and assessed by cross-validation to show the effectiveness of the proposed method. Accuracy values of up to 92% and 84% for CN/AD and CN/MCI classification are achieved. CONCLUSIONS: The method presented in this work shows that sparse representations of brain images are of importance for codifying and transferring relevant image features, as they may capture the salient features while maintaining lightweight data transactions. In fact, the method proposed in this work outperforms the classification results obtained using projection methods such as Principal Component Analysis for extracting representative features of the images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.512
GPT teacher head0.561
Teacher spread0.048 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Alzheimer ResearchSame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207