MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2761516325 · doi:10.1002/eji.201646632

Guidelines for the use of flow cytometry and cell sorting in immunological studies <sup>*</sup>

2017· article· en· W2761516325 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Immunology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune Cell Function and Interaction
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and ImmunityUniversité de SherbrookeSimon Fraser UniversityBC Cancer AgencyPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Children's HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institutes of HealthBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilKennedy Trust for Rheumatology ResearchNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungAgence Nationale de la RechercheFrancis Crick InstituteWellcome Trust
KeywordsBiologyFlow cytometrySortingCell sortingMass cytometryComputational biologyImmunologyGeneticsComputer sciencePhenotypeGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Funding Information: Mairi Mc Grath and Regina Stark thank Francesco Siracusa and Patrick Maschmeyer for providing data and Klaas van Gisbergen for helpful discussions. Philip E. Boulais and Paul S. Frenette are grateful to Dr. Sandra Pinho for helpful comments and suggestions. They thank the National Institutes of Health for their support (R01 grants DK056638, HL116340, HL097819 to P.S.F). They also thank the New York State Department of Health (NYSTEM Program) for shared facility (C029154) and research support (N13G-262) and the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society’s Translational Research Program. Funding Information: Acknowledgements: Enrico Lugli and Pratip K. Chattopadhyay were supported by grants from the Fondazione Cariplo (Grant Ricerca Biomedica 2012/0683), the Italian Ministry of Health (Bando Giovani Ricercatori GR-2011-02347324) and the European Union Marie Curie Career Integration Grant 322093 (all to E.L.). E.L. and P.K.C. are International Society for the Advancement of Cytometry (ISAC) Marylou Ingram scholars. Alice Yue and Ryan R. Brinkman were funded by Genome BC and NSERC. Klaus Warnatz received funding from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF 01EO1303) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DECIDE, DFG WA 1597/4-1 and the TRR130). The Jung laboratory is supported by funds of the ERC and ISF. Henrik Mei is a 2017-2021 ISAC scholar. Antonio Cosma is supported by the French government program: “Investissement d’avenir: Equipements d’Excellence” (EQUIPEX)-2010 FlowCyTech, Grant number: ANR-10-EQPX-02-01. Henrik Mei is supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG; grants Me3644/5-1 and TRR130/TP24). Funding Information: The Immunology Database and Analysis Portal (ImmPort) system provides an archive of immunology research data generated by investigators mainly funded through the National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation (DAIT). It is an extensive data warehouse containing an integration of experimental and clinical trial data generated by dozens of assay types, including 63 flow cytometry and 5 CyTOF data sets. In addition, the ImmPort system also provides data analysis tools and it contains implicit knowledge and ‘‘best practices’’ for clinical and genomic studies in the form of nearly 50 templates for data deposition, management, and dissemination. ImmPort has been developed under the Bioinformatics Integration Support Contract (BISC) by the Northrop Grumman Information Technology Health

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.660
Threshold uncertainty score0.602

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.151
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it