MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2762419171 · doi:10.2118/187310-ms

History Matching of Frequent Seismic Surveys Using Seismic Onset Times at the Peace River Field, Canada

2017· article· en· W2762419171 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyMatching (statistics)Seismic to simulationWorkflowRegional geologyPareto principleSeismologyComputer scienceSeismic inversionTectonicsMathematical optimizationGeographyMeteorologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present a novel and efficient approach to integrate frequent time lapse (4D) seismic data into high resolution reservoir models based on seismic onset times, defined as the calendar time when the seismic attribute crosses a pre-specified threshold value at a given location. Our approach reduces multiple time- lapse seismic survey data into a single map of onset times, leading to substantial data reduction for history matching while capturing all relevant information regarding fluid flow in the reservoir. Hence, the proposed approach is particularly well suited when frequent seismic surveys are available using permanently embedded sensors. Our history matching workflow consists of two stages: global and local. At the global stage of history matching, large-scale features such as regional permeabilities, pore volumes, temperature and fluid saturations are adjusted to match seismic and bottomhole pressure data using a Pareto-based multiobjective history matching workflow. Rather than an artificial subdivision of the domain, the history matching regions are naturally defined based on an eigen-decomposition of the grid Laplacian and a spectral clustering of the second eigenvector (fiedler vector). The global updating is followed by local history matching whereby cell permeabilities are adjusted to further refine the history match using semi- analytic, streamline-based model parameter sensitivities. The power and efficacy of our proposed approach is illustrated using synthetic and field applications. The field example involves steam injection into a heavy oil reservoir at Pad 31 in the Peace River Field (Alberta, Canada) with daily time lapse seismic surveys recorded by a permanently buried seismic monitoring system (Lopez et al. 2015). In our specific application, we have used time lapse data (in terms of two-way travel time) from a Cyclic Steam Stimulation (CSS) cycle in the pad with a total of 175 seismic surveys. With a single onset time map derived from this data we were able to capture the propagation of pressure and saturation fronts and significantly improve the dynamic model through the estimation of permeability distribution, fluid saturation evolution and swept volume. With this methodology we correctly identified and further refined the location of stimulated zones as inferred before from reservoir engineering judgement and manual adjustments aiding better understanding of CSS behavior in the studied field. The results clearly demonstrate the effectiveness of the onset time approach for integrating large number of seismic surveys by compressing them into a single map. Also, the onset times appear to be relatively insensitive to the petro elastic model but sensitive to the steam/fluid propagation, making it a robust method for history matching of time lapse surveys.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.109
Threshold uncertainty score0.940

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it