MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2762476240 · doi:10.7202/1048847ar

Corps en captivité

2017· article· fr· W2762476240 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSens public · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration and Exile Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

C’est à travers l’analyse textuelle de trois récits contemporains que cette contribution entend explorer la manière dont leurs auteurs livrent des « poéthiques » (Pinson) du corps captif, témoin ou victime du joug colonial : La Quarantaine (1995) de J.M.G. Le Clézio, Guyane : Traces-mémoires du bagne de Patrick Chamoiseau (1994 ; photographies de Rodolphe Hammadi) et Un dimanche au cachot (2007) du même écrivain. Cachot de Maîtres-békés, île Plate en quarantaine, bagne guyanais, que racontent de tels univers concentrationnaires à ces « chiffonniers » (Benjamin) de l’Histoire ? Se peut-il qu’à leur contact, les traces contingentes au passé colonial soient non plus « chosifiées » (Ricœur), mais émotionnelles et synesthésiques ? Aussi oppressant que soit le lieu, pourrait-il s’avérer libérateur d’une conscience de soi et d’un esprit de communauté ? Quelles questions d’ordre esthétique et éthique la perception et la figuration du corps palimpsestique soulèvent-elles sur l’indescriptible de la condition humaine enchaînée ?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.731
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it