MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2764252782 · doi:10.23919/fpl.2017.8056766

TAIGA: A new RISC-V soft-processor framework enabling high performance CPU architectural features

2017· article· en· W2764252782 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicParallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaXilinx
KeywordsComputer sciencePipeline (software)Field-programmable gate arrayEmbedded systemARM architectureReduced instruction set computingComputer architectureCoprocessorProcessor designBridging (networking)Instruction setComputer hardwareOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, there has been an increased focus on integration of reconfigurable fabric with modern processors. However, existing soft-processors are optimized to leverage older FPGA fabrics, focus primarily on resource minimization and have fixed-pipeline designs that limit the scope for tightly integrated hardware accelerators. In this work, we present Taiga: a RISC-V, 32-bit, soft-processor architecture supporting the RISC-V Multiply/Divide and Atomic operations extensions (RV32IMA) designed to support Linux-based shared-memory systems. The processor design is highly configurable and features a standardized interface for functional units allowing for ease of integration of new functional units. Despite a more complex pipeline, our design uses approximately 33% fewer slices while clocking 39% faster than a LEON3 based system built on a Xilinx Zynq X7CZ020.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.828
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it