Adaptive Message Routing and Replication in Mobile Opportunistic Networks for Connected Communities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mobile opportunistic networking is a promising technology that can supplement existing cellular and WiFi networks to provide desirable services for smart and connected communities. Message routing is the most compelling challenge in mobile opportunistic networks due to the lack of contemporaneous end-to-end paths and the resource constraints at mobile devices. To improve the probability of successful message delivery, most existing routing schemes use the past contact history to predict future contacts for message forwarding, and exploit message replication and redundancy for multicopy routing. However, most existing prediction-based routing schemes simply use the average pairwise contact probability as the routing metric and neglect the benefits of exploring fine-grained contact information such as pairwise repeated contact patterns to improve the accuracy of predicting future contacts. Moreover, there is no efficient mechanism that can adaptively control message replication in a decentralized manner to achieve both high probability of successful message delivery and low message overhead. To address these problems, we present FGAR, a routing protocol designed for mobile opportunistic networks by leveraging fine-grained contact characterization and adaptive message replication. In FGAR, contact history is characterized in a fine-grained manner with timing information using a sliding window mechanism, and future contacts are predicted based on the fine-grained contact information, thereby improving the accuracy of contact prediction. We further design an efficient message replication scheme in which message replication is controlled in a fully decentralized manner by taking into account the expected message delivery probability, the replication history, and the quality of the encountered device. A replica is generated only when it is necessary to fulfill the expected message delivery probability. We evaluate our scheme through trace-driven simulations, and the simulation results show that FGAR outperforms existing schemes. In comparison with PRoPHET, FGAR can achieve more than 20% improvement on average on successful message delivery, whereas the message overhead has been reduced by a factor up to 15.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".