MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2765892911 · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.1368

Control of an electromechanical clutch actuator by a parallel Adaptive Feedforward and Bang-Bang controller: Simulation and Experimental results

2017· article· en· W2765892911 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIFAC-PapersOnLine · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIterative Learning Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeed forwardClutchControl theory (sociology)Bang–bang controlActuatorController (irrigation)Adaptive controlControl (management)Control engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringOptimal controlMathematicsAutomotive engineeringBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vehicle’s powertrain performance and comfort are largely depending on the clutch control strategy for an Automated Manual Transmission (AMT). The aim of the clutch control strategy is to ensure the smooth running of clutch operational cases: a comfortable clutch launch (vehicle takes off smoothly without jerk), a fast upshift/downshift (gear ratio changes) and a fast clutch opening. In most industrial cases, regardless of clutch actuation technology, clutch control is managed by clutch pressure control. However, the clutch pressure control is a challenge regarding clutch non-linearities and time-varying parameters. In this paper, a parallel adaptive feedforward and bang-bang controller is proposed in order to control the clutch pressure with an electromechanical clutch actuator. In this system, a control issue comes from potential time-varying parameters but the main challenge comes from the hysteretic behavior of the system due to dry friction in the actuator assembly. An analytic model of the clutch and its electromechanical actuator including dry friction has been constructed and a prototype has been designed and integrated on a test bench. The parallel adaptive feedforward and bang-bang controller architecture and algorithms are developed. For three critical clutch operational cases, simulations and experiments have been run. Finally, in spite of time-varying parameters and a high hysteretic system behavior, simulation and experimental control results highlight that the controller allows a precise tracking of the pressure reference and a fast time response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it