MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2766299720 · doi:10.1137/17m1120634

Symmetric Interior Penalty Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Elliptic Problems in Polygons

2017· article· en· W2766299720 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Fabian Müller, Dominik Schötzau, Christoph Schwab

Bibliographic record

VenueSIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
KeywordsMathematicsPolygon meshDiscontinuous Galerkin methodRate of convergenceNorm (philosophy)Boundary value problemFinite element methodMathematical analysisAsymptotic expansionBoundary (topology)Galerkin methodApplied mathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We analyze symmetric interior penalty discontinuous Galerkin (DG) finite element methods for linear, second-order elliptic boundary-value problems in polygons $\Omega$ with straight edges where solutions exhibit singular behavior near corners, and at boundary points where boundary conditions change. To resolve corner singularities, we admit both graded meshes and bisection refinement meshes. We prove that judiciously chosen refinement parameters in these mesh families imply optimal asymptotic rates of convergence with respect to the total number of degrees of freedom $N$, both for the DG energy norm error and the $L^2$-norm error. The sharpness of our asymptotic convergence rate estimates is confirmed in a series of numerical experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSIAM Journal on Numerical AnalysisSame topicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational MathematicsFrench-language works237,207