Quality-of-Experience of Adaptive Video Streaming
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the remarkable growth of adaptive streaming media applications, especially the wide usage of dynamic adaptive streaming schemes over HTTP (DASH), it becomes ever more important to understand the perceptual quality-of-experience (QoE) of end users, who may be constantly experiencing adaptations (switchings) of video bitrate, spatial resolution, and frame-rate from one time segment to another in a scale of a few seconds. This is a sophisticated and challenging problem, for which existing visual studies provide very limited guidance. Here we build a new adaptive streaming video database and carry out a series of subjective experiments to understand human QoE behaviors in this multi-dimensional adaptation space. Our study leads to several useful findings. First, our path-analytic results show that quality deviation introduced by quality adaptation is asymmetric with respect to the adaptation direction (positive or negative), and is further influenced by the intensity of quality change (intensity), dimension of adaptation (type), intrinsic video quality (level), content, and the interactions between them. Second, we find that for the same intensity of quality adaptation, a positive adaptation occurred in the low-quality range has more impact on QoE, suggesting an interesting Weber's law effect; while such phenomenon is reversed for a negative adaptation. Third, existing objective video quality assessment models are very limited in predicting time-varying video quality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".