MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2767359317 · doi:10.1109/twc.2017.2769644

User Scheduling and Resource Allocation in HetNets With Hybrid Energy Supply: An Actor-Critic Reinforcement Learning Approach

2017· article· en· W2767359317 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceReinforcement learningHeterogeneous networkMathematical optimizationWireless networkScheduling (production processes)Base stationDistributed computingEfficient energy useCellular networkWirelessComputer networkTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligenceEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Densely deployment of various small-cell base stations in cellular networks to increase capacity will lead to heterogeneous networks (HetNets), and meanwhile, embedding the energy harvesting capabilities in base stations as an alternative energy supply is becoming a reality. How to make efficient utilization of radio resource and renewable energy is a brand-new challenge. This paper investigates the optimal policy for user scheduling and resource allocation in HetNets powered by hybrid energy with the purpose of maximizing energy efficiency of the overall network. Since wireless channel conditions and renewable energy arrival rates have stochastic properties and the environment's dynamics are unknown, the model-free reinforcement learning approach is used to learn the optimal policy through interactions with the environment. To solve our problem with continuous-valued state and action variables, a policy-gradient-based actor-critic algorithm is proposed. The actor part uses the Gaussian distribution as the parameterized policy to generate continuous stochastic actions, and the policy parameters are updated with the gradient ascent method. The critic part uses compatible function approximation to estimate the performance of the policy and helps the actor learn the gradient of the policy. The advantage function is used to further reduce the variance of the policy gradient. Using the numerical simulations, we demonstrate the convergence property of the proposed algorithm and analyze network energy efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.700
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it