Acute and chronic fluid misdirection syndrome: pathophysiology and treatment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To summarize our current understanding of the specific pathogenic mechanisms of the fluid misdirection syndrome and possible treatment methods. METHODS: We used the PubMed web platform to find relevant studies using the following keywords: infusion misdirection syndrome, aqueous misdirection syndrome, ciliary block, ciliovitreal block, capsular block, intraoperative fluid misdirection, subcapsular fluid entrapment, acute intraoperative rock-hard eye syndrome, positive vitreous pressure glaucoma, and malignant glaucoma. Other publications were also considered as a potential source of information when referenced in relevant articles. RESULTS: We collected and analyzed 55 articles dated from 1951 to 2016. Acute intraoperative rock-hard eye syndrome is characterized by a very shallow anterior chamber with the absence of suprachoroidal effusion or hemorrhage and no noticeable pathology of the iris-lens diaphragm. It usually occurs during uneventful phacoemulsification, particularly in hyperopic eyes. The pathophysiology of acute fluid misdirection syndrome is based on inappropriate movement of balanced salt solution via the zonular fibers. This syndrome has also been described as occurring from hours to months, or years, after the initial surgery. The pathophysiology of malignant glaucoma is based on similar mechanisms of cilio-lenticular block of aqueous flow leading to the misdirection of aqueous posteriorly into or besides the vitreous gel. Faced with these situations, vitreous decompression is required, preferably with hyaloido-capsulo-iridectomy. In phakic eyes, concomitant cataract extraction would be desirable. CONCLUSIONS: We believe both of these clinical conditions should be considered as one syndrome. We suggest the term acute fluid misdirection syndrome for the cascade of events during phacoemulsification surgery. Chronic fluid misdirection syndrome better describes the nature of malignant glaucoma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".