MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2768653190 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2017.2775959

Multiband Spectrum Sensing and Resource Allocation for IoT in Cognitive 5G Networks

2017· article· en· W2768653190 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum Sensing
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceQuality of serviceCognitive radioComputer networkControl reconfigurationReliability (semiconductor)Energy consumptionResource allocationNode (physics)Latency (audio)Distributed computingWirelessTelecommunicationsEmbedded systemEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The proliferation of the Internet of Things (IoT) demands a diverse and wide range of requirements in terms of latency, reliability, energy efficiency, etc. Future IoT systems must have the ability to deal with the challenging requirements of both users and applications. Cognitive fifth generation (5G) network is envisioned to play a key role in leveraging the performance of IoT systems. IoT systems in cognitive 5G network are expected to provide flexible delivery of broad services and robust operations under highly dynamic conditions. In this paper, we present multiband cooperative spectrum sensing and resource allocation framework for IoT in cognitive 5G networks. Multiband approach can significantly reduce energy consumption for spectrum sensing compared to the traditional single-band scheme. We formulate an optimization problem to determine a minimum number of channels to be sensed by each IoT node in multiband approach to minimize the energy consumption for spectrum sensing while satisfying probabilities of detection and false alarm requirements. We then propose a cross-layer reconfiguration scheme (CLRS) for dynamic resource allocation in IoT applications with different quality-of-service (QoS) requirements including data rate, latency, reliability, economic price, and environment cost. The potential game is employed for crosslayer reconfiguration, in which IoT nodes are considered as the players. The proposed CLRS efficiently allocate resources to satisfy QoS requirements through opportunistic spectrum access. Finally, extensive simulation results are presented to demonstrate the benefits offered by the proposed framework for IoT systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score0.674

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it