MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2769821839 · doi:10.1115/dscc2017-5340

An Adaptive PID Controller Based on Bayesian Theory

2017· article· en· W2769821839 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPID controllerControl theory (sociology)Gain schedulingComputer scienceController (irrigation)Control engineeringBayesian probabilityTrajectoryTemperature controlEngineeringControl (management)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the most popular trajectory-tracking controllers used in industry is the PID controller. The PID controller utilizes three types of gains and the tracking error in order to provide a control gain to a system. The PID gains may be tuned manually or using a number of different techniques. Under most operating conditions, only one set of PID gains are used. However, techniques exist to compensate for dynamic systems such as gain scheduling or basic time-varying functions. In this paper, an adaptive PID controller is presented based on Bayesian theory. The interacting multiple model (IMM) method, which utilizes Bayes’ theorem and likelihood functions, is implemented on the PID controller to present an adaptive control strategy. The strategy is applied to a simulated electromechanical system, and the results of the proposed controller are compared with the standard PID method. Future work is also considered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score0.450

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207