MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2770939264 · doi:10.11647/obp.0122.12

12. Experiencing Information: An Early Nineteenth-Century Stroll Along Nevskii Prospekt

2017· book-chapter· en· W2770939264 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Book Publishers · 2017
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedia, Communication, and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of CambridgeLeverhulme Trust
KeywordsHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bowers shifts the perspective from producers onto viewers, and discusses, on the basis of a close reading of visual and verbal responses to a particularly prominent public space (Nevskii Prospekt in St Petersburg in the 1830s and 1840s), aspects of the reception and perception of the urban display of information. Nevskii Prospekt is widely considered Russia’s most well-known boulevard. Bowers utilises eighteenth- and nineteenth-century artists’ renderings and writers’ sketches which generate ‘snapshots’—in a sense—of the street’s life, giving insight into its appearance before the development of photography. In particular, she uses Sadovnikov’s Panorama as a case study to enable close observation of the minutiae of shop signs, their placement, arrangement, contents, and aesthetic, harking back to Franklin’s investigation into the Russian graphosphere in chapter 11.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScholarly communication
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.629
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0110.033
Open science0.0040.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it