MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2771567113 · doi:10.1093/tandt/ttx176

Welcome back stranger: a Canadian perspective on the taxation of privately owned business entities and owners

2017· article· en· W2771567113 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elie S. Roth

Bibliographic record

VenueTrusts & Trustees · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicTaxation and Legal Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapitalizationBusinessCorporationIncome taxLiabilityLimited liabilityAccountingFinancePublic economicsEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article contains a summary overview of the income taxation of Canadian resident and non-resident owners of privately owned business entities. It commences with a summary of the following business entities typically utilized in structuring privately owned businesses in Canada, and summarizes the characteristics of each and their domestic tax treatment: corporations, unlimited liability companies, general and limited partnerships and trusts. The article then outlines the general scheme in the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the ‘Act’) for taxation of non-residents in respect of investment in Canadian private business entities, including an overview of the Canadian withholding tax regime, issues related to the determination of whether to invest through a Canadian branch or subsidiary corporation, the taxation of certain hybrid entities and a review of capitalization considerations, including the Canadian thin capitalization and interest imputation rules. The taxation of the disposition of shares or interests in Canadian business entities by non-resident investors is then discussed. The article concludes with a summary of the taxation of non-resident beneficiaries of Canadian resident trusts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.145
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0110.007
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTrusts & TrusteesSame topicTaxation and Legal IssuesFrench-language works237,207