MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2771573249 · doi:10.15353/vsnl.v3i1.182

Automated Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy Using Compact Deep Networks

2017· article· en· W2771573249 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computational Vision and Imaging Systems · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNvidia
KeywordsDiabetic retinopathyBlindnessRetinopathyMedicineFundus (uterus)Diabetes mellitusOptometryRetinalRetinaOphthalmologyIntensive care medicineComputer scienceNeurosciencePsychologyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diabetes is a chronic condition affecting millions of people worldwide.One of its major complications is diabetic retinopathy (DR),which is the most common cause of legal blindness in the developedworld. Early screening and treatment of DR prevents visiondeterioration, however the recommendation of yearly screening isoften not being met. Mobile screening centres can increasing DRscreening, however they are time and resource intensive becausea clinician is required to process the images. This process can beimproved through computer aided diagnosis, such as by integratingautomated screening on smartphones. Here we explore the useof a SqueezeNet-based deep network trained on a fundus imagedataset composed of over 88,000 retinal images for the purpose ofcomputer aided screening for diabetic retinopathy. The results ofthis neural network validated the viability of conducting automatedmobile screening of diabetic retinopathy, such as on a smartphoneplatform.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.511
Threshold uncertainty score0.426

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it