An Algorithm for Clustering Categorical Data With Set-Valued Features
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In data mining, objects are often represented by a set of features, where each feature of an object has only one value. However, in reality, some features can take on multiple values, for instance, a person with several job titles, hobbies, and email addresses. These features can be referred to as set-valued features and are often treated with dummy features when using existing data mining algorithms to analyze data with set-valued features. In this paper, we propose an SV- $k$ -modes algorithm that clusters categorical data with set-valued features. In this algorithm, a distance function is defined between two objects with set-valued features, and a set-valued mode representation of cluster centers is proposed. We develop a heuristic method to update cluster centers in the iterative clustering process and an initialization algorithm to select the initial cluster centers. The convergence and complexity of the SV- $k$ -modes algorithm are analyzed. Experiments are conducted on both synthetic data and real data from five different applications. The experimental results have shown that the SV- $k$ -modes algorithm performs better when clustering real data than do three other categorical clustering algorithms and that the algorithm is scalable to large data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".