Bibliographic record
Abstract
Research Article| May 01, 2016 Geomodels in Engineering Geology—An Introduction: (Peter Fookes, Geoff Pettifer, and Tony Waltham) Richard Jackson Richard Jackson 11 Venus Crescent, Geofirma Engineering Ltd., Heidelberg, Ontario N0B 2M1, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Richard Jackson 11 Venus Crescent, Geofirma Engineering Ltd., Heidelberg, Ontario N0B 2M1, Canada Publisher: Association of Environmental & Engineering Geologists First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Online Issn: 1558-9161 Print Issn: 1078-7275 © 2016 Association of Environmental & Engineering Geologists Environmental & Engineering Geoscience (2016) 22 (2): 171–172. https://doi.org/10.2113/gseegeosci.22.2.171 Article history First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Richard Jackson; Geomodels in Engineering Geology—An Introduction: (Peter Fookes, Geoff Pettifer, and Tony Waltham). Environmental & Engineering Geoscience 2016;; 22 (2): 171–172. doi: https://doi.org/10.2113/gseegeosci.22.2.171 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyEnvironmental & Engineering Geoscience Search Advanced Search This is an unusual and welcome contribution to the engineering geology literature. The preamble outlines the concept of a "geomodel" and its depiction in simplified block diagrams is useful for the engineering geologist and geotechnical engineer. The geomodel approach was developed in the UK because of the popularity of Fookes' Glossop Lecture before the Engineering Geology Group of the Geological Society of London, which was subsequently published as Fookes (1997). It is written in the British tradition of engineering geomorphology. The purpose of the book is "to help engineers visualize the three-dimensional geology and to act as a quick... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".