MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2773721243 · doi:10.1111/cid.12575

Clinical and radiographic peri‐implant parameters and proinflammatory cytokine levels among cigarette smokers, smokeless tobacco users, and nontobacco users

2017· article· en· W2773721243 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFacial Trauma and Fracture Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCore Research for Evolutional Science and TechnologyKing Saud University
KeywordsMedicinePeriImplantPeri-implantitisDentistryBleeding on probingRadiographyInternal medicinePeriodontitisSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: It is postulated that clinical and radiographic peri-implant parameters are worse and levels of interleukin (IL)-1β and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 in the peri-implant sulcular fluid (PISF) are higher in cigarette-smokers (CS) and smokeless-tobacco users (STU) compared with nontobacco user (NTU). PURPOSE: The present study aimed to compare clinical and radiographic peri-implant inflammatory parameters and levels of IL-1β and MMP-9 levels among CS, STU, and NTU. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five CS (Group-1), 42 STU (Group-2), and 44 NTU (Group-3) were included. Demographic data was collected using a structured baseline questionnaire. Peri-implant plaque index (PI), bleeding on probing (BOP), and probing depth (PD) were recorded and crestal bone loss (CBL) were assessed using standardized digital radiographs. PISF volume and levels of IL-1β and MMP-9 in PISF were quantified using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Clinical peri-implant parameters and PISF IL-1β and MMP-9 concentrations were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis test. Bonferroni post hoc adjustment test was used for multiple comparisons. P-value was set at .05. RESULTS: Peri-implant PI and PD were significantly worse in group-1 and group-2 patients as compared to group-3 individuals (P < .05). Peri-implant CBL was also significantly higher in group-1 and group-2 compared with group-3 (P < .05). Peri-implant BOP was significantly higher in group-2 and group-3 as compared to group-1 individuals (P < .05). The PISF volume (P < .05) collected and levels of IL-1β and MMP-9 were statistically significantly elevated among individuals in group-1 and group-2 compared with group-3 (P < .01). There was no significant difference in PI, PD, CBL, and PISF levels of IL-1β and MMP-9 among participants in groups 1 and 2. CONCLUSION: Clinical and radiographic peri-implant parameters were compromised among CS and STU as compared to NTU. Increased expression of local proinflammatory cytokines may explain greater susceptibility of CS and STU to peri-implant breakdown.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.432
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it