MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2775290046 · doi:10.18162/fp.2017.a135

Using Humanoïd Robots to Support Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder

2017· article· en· W2775290046 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueFormation et profession · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAutism Spectrum Disorder Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversité de MontréalCégep de Saint-Laurent
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutism spectrum disorderRobotPsychologySpectrum (functional analysis)AutismHuman–computer interactionComputer scienceDevelopmental psychologyArtificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, an increasing number of robots have found their way into American, Asian, and European classrooms.With names like Bee-Bot, Dash, Mindstorm, and Sphero, they offer exciting educational potential and have attracted growing attention from the education community.Recent studies have shown that these robots can serve as powerful educational tools, especially for students with learning disabilities.A robot subgroup, the anthropomorphic robot, appears poised to become the gold standard for educational use.The anticipated contributions of the anthropomorphic robot to development and learning provided the motivation for an exploratory research project.This paper focuses on the application of a robot called NAO to support children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.456
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it