De 1984 à 2084. Mutations de la peur totalitaire dans la dystopie européenne
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Autres temps, autres peurs. Lors de la rédaction de 1984, Georges Orwell voyait se profiler le spectre des totalitarismes après la Seconde Guerre Mondiale. Un futur sombre pour un monde cauchemardesque, dans lequel l’individu est dissout dans la communauté, l’amour est absent, l’obéissance un devoir et la surveillance totale. Si les dystopies qui se sont développées à la suite d’Orwell se sont chacune intéressées à une particularité de l’idéal sociétal (le bonheur, la famille par exemple), 2084 est certainement celle qui se réclame le plus de 1984. Pourtant le monde décrit par Boualem Sansal est en apparence bien différent car théocratique et sans technologie forte. Mon propos sera pourtant de montrer que le roman dystopique de Boualem Sansal est une suite directe de 1984 et que cette mutation de l’univers dystopique de Georges Orwell est un signal d’alarme lancé par Sansal à une Europe en déclin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".