MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2775702185 · doi:10.4000/carnets.2344

De 1984 à 2084. Mutations de la peur totalitaire dans la dystopie européenne

2017· article· fr· W2775702185 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCarnets · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Autres temps, autres peurs. Lors de la rédaction de 1984, Georges Orwell voyait se profiler le spectre des totalitarismes après la Seconde Guerre Mondiale. Un futur sombre pour un monde cauchemardesque, dans lequel l’individu est dissout dans la communauté, l’amour est absent, l’obéissance un devoir et la surveillance totale. Si les dystopies qui se sont développées à la suite d’Orwell se sont chacune intéressées à une particularité de l’idéal sociétal (le bonheur, la famille par exemple), 2084 est certainement celle qui se réclame le plus de 1984. Pourtant le monde décrit par Boualem Sansal est en apparence bien différent car théocratique et sans technologie forte. Mon propos sera pourtant de montrer que le roman dystopique de Boualem Sansal est une suite directe de 1984 et que cette mutation de l’univers dystopique de Georges Orwell est un signal d’alarme lancé par Sansal à une Europe en déclin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.802
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it