MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W277756176

Oceanography for the Visually Impaired.

2008· article· en· W277756176 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kate Fraser

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Science Teacher · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCoastal and Marine Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneral partnershipTRIPS architectureCreaturesLibrary scienceEngineeringGeographyPolitical scienceArchaeologyComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] Amy Bower is a physical oceanographer and senior scientist at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) in Woods Hole, Massachusetts--she has also been legally blind for 14 years. Through her partnership with the Perkins School for the Blind in Watertown, Massachusetts, the oldest K-12 school for the visually impaired in the United States, students have the unique opportunity to learn from a practicing research scientist who shares their particular disability. This article describes the project, called OceanInsight, which provides visually impaired students with an interactive way to study oceanography, including field trips to Woods Hole and school visits by Bower and other WHOI scientists (see background). As a Perkins middle and high school science teacher involved in OceanInsight, I was able to join Bower on a research expedition to the Labrador Sea, which lies between Canada and Greenland. With the help of technology, my students at Perkins communicated with us while we were on the ship. We continue to follow Bower's research on the project's website (see On the web at the end of this article), and my students participate in corresponding classroom projects. Field trips to Woods Hole In the first year of the OceanInsight partnership, which began in the fall of 2006, Woods Hole welcomed our students into their community and provided them with hands-on experience in oceanography. At the WHOI exhibit center, students handled whale bones usually covered by display cases and examined small sea creatures with aquarium staff. They marveled at a Styrofoam cup that had shrunk to the size of a thimble from the pressure in the ocean depths and listened to the sounds of dolphins and whales. Students also got to sit in a model of the deep-ocean research submersible Alvin. In the research labs, students examined equipment that was under construction by the project's engineers, including profiling floats, which are 1.5 m tubes containing sensors that measure ocean temperature and salinity, and current meters that measure and record the speed and direction of the ocean water. This equipment would be used to collect data on Bower's research expedition to study the Irminger a group of eddies in the Labrador Sea (see More on Irminger Rings, p. 32). During these field trips, our students also had the opportunity to explore the R/V Knorr--the same research vessel I would later sail on with Bower and her crew. After climbing the steep stairs between the decks and visiting the scientists' sleeping quarters, students ate bag lunches in the mess hall. In the ship's lab areas, students checked out the lab tables with raised edges, similar to a very large cafeteria tray, that were designed to keep equipment from slipping off while on the high seas. Then, the group moved onto the stern, where large cranes were moving equipment on and off the ship, and examined the chains used to fasten equipment to the deck and to moor the ship in the harbor. The R/V Knorr is a typical research vessel. While aboard, Bower uses a white mobility cane to give her information as she moves about, just as our students did on this visit. A person who is blind can detect doorways, drop-offs, stairs, and turns using a mobility cane. Special accommodations on this ship would include letting a visually impaired person know if a piece of equipment is being moved and storing equipment in an organized, predictable way (which scientists like to do anyway!). Scientists in the classroom During several visits to Perkins in the fall of 2006, Bower met with introductory high school physics and chemistry classes (grades 9-11), as well as middle school science classes. These visits occurred just a few weeks after the students' first field trip to WHOI. Bower described her field and office work at Woods Hole to students and introduced them to the basic principles of her research and her September 2007 expedition to study the Irminger Rings in the Labrador Sea. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score0.452

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1350.039

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Science TeacherSame topicCoastal and Marine ManagementFrench-language works237,207