MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W277893790

Hawthorne's Transatlantic Gothic House of Fiction: The House of the Seven Gables

2012· article· en· W277893790 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueNathaniel Hawthorne Review · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCrime and Detective Fiction Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPortraitLiteraturePublishingHistoryPeriod (music)ClassicsArt historyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Poe's 1842 review of Hawthorne's Twice-Told Tales features an error--Poe suggests that Hawthorne's Howe's Masquerade (1838) may have plagiarized from William Wilson (1839), even though such plagiarism would be impossible, since Hawthorne's tale was published a year before William Wilson appeared. readers of Poe have long understood, Poe was not immune to tendency toward plagiarism he was so keen to descry in works of his peers. Poe's Life in Death (1842) (later Oval Portrait, 1845) and Masque of Red Death (1842) have been linked to Hawthorne's previously published Prophetic Pictures (1836) and Howe's Masquerade (1838) (Dowell, Lauber, Regan). More recently, Richard Kopley has reconceived The Scarlet Letter (1850) at least in part as a retelling of Tell-Tale Heart (1843). (1) Both Poe and Hawthorne came of age as writers in an era marked by a lack of international copyright, a situation that led to rampant and republication of written materials in English and subsequently depressed remuneration that writers on either side of Atlantic could expect or claim. Like Poe, Hawthorne spent his formative years as a writer mired in what Poe dubbed the Magazine Prison-House (1845), publishing for little pay in magazines, story-papers, and gift books. Both writers produced fiction during a period that was profoundly impacted by transatlantic publishing practices. Further, just as Poe apprenticed himself to what has been called British Magazine Tradition (Allen), Hawthorne was schooled by transatlantic periodicals, including Gentlemans Magazine, London Quarterly Review, Monthly Magazine, European Magazine, Edinburgh Review, and Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine (Kesselring). It has been argued that one of Hawthorne's early Gothic tales, Alice Doane's Appeal (1834), was significantly lifted from a partial translation of an E.T.A. Hoffmann novel Hawthorne read in an edition of Blackwood's, despite its Salem witch trials frame and its reference to American gift book, Token. Indeed, in review of Twice Told-Tales containing Poe's false accusation of plagiarism, Poe remarks on origins of what he calls tale of terror, or passion, or horror. Poe labels this genre collectively as tales of effect many fine examples of which found in earlier numbers of Blackwood. These were relished by every man of genius (Thompson 573); and, as Poe concludes review, Mr. Hawthorne is a man of truest genius (Thompson 577). While Poe failed in detecting a plagiarism in Hawthorne, he recognized influence of British fictional conventions, particularly those related to Gothic. Poe praised Twice-Told Tales in nationalistic terms: As Americans, we feel proud of (Thompson 574). The irony of Poe's praise, however, is that his fellow author is lauded as worthy of his British prototypes: Articles at random, now and then, might be advantageously compared with best effusions of British Magazines; but, upon whole, we are far behind our progenitors in this department of literature (Thompson 573-74). Just as both Poe and Hawthorne's fiction share Gothic conventions--the masquerade, double, haunted dwellings, dying women, obsessive individuals, self-punishing guilty, murderous if not murdering--both writers haunted by publishing norms that rewarded conventionality and stifled originality through a corrupt system of puffery and a transatlantic culture of reprinting (McGill; see also Charvat and Winship). Poe punned, 1842 edition of Twice-Told Tales--an updated reprint of a book of magazine fiction reprints--really meant that most of Hawthorne's stories in that collection thrice-told (Thompson 568). Both writers felt oppressed by scanty remuneration and small chance for recognition afforded by publishing in magazines and gift books. In early 1844, Hawthorne called writing stories for periodicals the most unprofitable business in world (16:23). …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.892
Threshold uncertainty score0.730

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it