MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2780938199 · doi:10.1002/jid.3339

Payday Lending and Microcredit: Two Faces of the Same Problem?

2017· article· en· W2780938199 on OpenAlexaffabout
Khan Jahirul Islam, Wayne Simpson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of International Development · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusKelowna General HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRespondentFinancial literacyLoanPoliticsEconomicsMicrofinanceBusinessDevelopment economicsDemographic economicsEconomic growthFinancePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Despite large differences in socio‐economic, geographical and political background, this study finds noteworthy similarities in the determinants of financial exclusion in Canada and Bangladesh. Household income, education, regional differences and respondent age are common significant determinants of payday loan borrowing in Canada and microcredit borrowing in Bangladesh. Financial knowledge has been identified as a significant determinant of payday loan borrowing in Canada. Our results suggest the need for paying more attention to the causes of financial exclusion and to improving financial literacy because the regulatory policies on interest rates in both countries do not seem to be effective. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.128
Threshold uncertainty score0.255

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.006
Scholarly communication0.0040.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of International DevelopmentSame topicFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement AnalysisFrench-language works237,207