MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2781624880 · doi:10.4000/lerhistoria.2837

Female foul language and foul female agents in pre-modern Portugal

2017· article· en· W2781624880 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLer História · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Gender and Feminism Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Winnipeg
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJurisdictionLegislationEliteGovernment (linguistics)LawPolitical scienceHistoryPublic administrationPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Through the examination of a number of archival sources and legislation from the late fourteenth to the eighteenth century, this study looks at the phenomenon of the female scold in pre-modern Portugal. Municipal records from certain regions indicate that local officials were confronted with disturbances caused by the scold, and royal ordinances outlined the jurisdiction for sentencing scolds. At both levels of government, the scold was persistently depicted as female. Moreover, a few elite male writers highlighted the problem with the quarrelsome woman, and offered their misogynist solutions to this perceived problem. The study concludes with an analysis of a decision rendered by Lisbon’s municipal council in the second half of the eighteenth century, a decision that aimed to abolish the office that dealt with scolding women.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.702
Threshold uncertainty score0.787

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it