Max-SNR Opportunistic Routing for Large-Scale Energy Harvesting Sensor Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Providing sensors with adequate energy in largescale wireless sensor networks (WSNs) over long periods is a major bottleneck in their implementation. In this regard, energy harvesting (EH), i.e., capturing energy from ambient renewable energy sources, is a promising solution for low-power and low data-rate WSNs. The randomness in the energy available forces the redesign of WSN protocols. Our specific interest here is to enable the delivery of sensed data to a fusion center (FC) in a large-scale EH-WSN. We propose a novel, energy-aware, opportunistic routing protocol in a large-scale EH-WSN requiring multi-hop communication. In choosing the best forwarding partner, our scheme considers the energy available at sensor nodes, their distances from the FC and also the amount of data to be transmitted. Our protocol requires no prior knowledge of the network topology. We provide a mathematical analysis of our routing protocol to confirm the achieved numerical results. As our results show, the proposed protocol significantly increases data delivery as compared to the state-of-the-art technologies. We also introduce an EH-aware manner for distributing sensors in the environment such that all nodes have approximately equal transmission load independent of their locations, which significantly increases the data delivery ratio.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it