MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2783068482 · doi:10.3138/seminar.54.1.2

Self-Ridiculing Nostalgia: Joseph Roth’s <i>Die Kapuzinergruft</i>

2018· article· en· W2783068482 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSeminar A Journal of Germanic Studies · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicNostalgia and Consumer Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReinterpretationMythologyJudaismArtArt historyPhilosophyLiteratureTheologyAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article argues for a reinterpretation of the role of Habsburg nostalgia in Die Kapuzinergruft, the final novel by the Austrian-Jewish writer Joseph Roth. From the early 1930s onward, Roth had been an enthusiastic proponent of the Habsburg myth, and the tenor of his pro-Habsburg journalism became particularly adulatory during the final years of his life. Partly as a result of this, Die Kapuzinergruft is frequently read as a heavy-handed endorsement of Austria’s imperial past, although several valuable contra-nostalgic interpretations of the text have appeared in recent years. This article reconciles the differences between these two views of the novel by arguing that in fact the work dramatizes Roth’s inner conflict between the solace offered by Habsburg nostalgia and his own awareness of the perceptual, psychological, and moral weaknesses that such nostalgia entailed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.131
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it