MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2783068482 · doi:10.3138/seminar.54.1.2

Self-Ridiculing Nostalgia: Joseph Roth’s <i>Die Kapuzinergruft</i>

2018· article· en· W2783068482 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Katy Heady

Bibliographic record

VenueSeminar A Journal of Germanic Studies · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicNostalgia and Consumer Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReinterpretationMythologyJudaismArtArt historyPhilosophyLiteratureTheologyAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article argues for a reinterpretation of the role of Habsburg nostalgia in Die Kapuzinergruft, the final novel by the Austrian-Jewish writer Joseph Roth. From the early 1930s onward, Roth had been an enthusiastic proponent of the Habsburg myth, and the tenor of his pro-Habsburg journalism became particularly adulatory during the final years of his life. Partly as a result of this, Die Kapuzinergruft is frequently read as a heavy-handed endorsement of Austria’s imperial past, although several valuable contra-nostalgic interpretations of the text have appeared in recent years. This article reconciles the differences between these two views of the novel by arguing that in fact the work dramatizes Roth’s inner conflict between the solace offered by Habsburg nostalgia and his own awareness of the perceptual, psychological, and moral weaknesses that such nostalgia entailed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.011
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeminar A Journal of Germanic StudiesSame topicNostalgia and Consumer BehaviorFrench-language works237,207