MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2784107617 · doi:10.1109/uemcon.2017.8248990

Electromagnetic analysis method for ultra low power cipher Midori

2017· article· en· W2784107617 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Masaya Yoshikawa, Yusuke Nozaki

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptographic Implementations and Security
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceEgg Farmers of CanadaNational Security Agency
KeywordsSide channel attackCipherCryptographyComputer sciencePower analysisPower (physics)Power consumptionElectromagnetic radiationKey (lock)Electrical engineeringComputer securityEngineeringEncryptionPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, low power ciphers that can be used in IoT devices have attracted the attention of many researchers. The power consumption of Midori is the lowest of all available ciphers. In hardware security, side-channel attacks pose a danger because they illegally analyze the secret key in a cryptographic device using the power consumption and electromagnetic waves generated during the device's operation. One type of side-channel attack that uses electromagnetic waves is called electromagnetic analysis. To examine the safety of future IoT devices, it is extremely important to investigate the resistance of Midori, an extremely low-power cipher, to electromagnetic analysis (tamper resistance). However, to our knowledge, no studies have reported on electromagnetic analysis against Midori. The present study proposes a method of electromagnetic analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryptographic Implementations and SecurityFrench-language works237,207