MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2784669784 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2013-0028

A PRACTICAL TRAJECTORY TRACKING APPROACH FOR AUTONOMOUS MOBILE ROBOTS: NONLINEAR ADAPTIVE <i>H</i><sub>2</sub> DESIGN

2013· article· en· W2784669784 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl and Dynamics of Mobile Robots
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Science Council
KeywordsTrajectoryControl theory (sociology)Mobile robotNonlinear systemTracking (education)Computer scienceController (irrigation)RobotControl engineeringTracking errorAdaptive controlSimple (philosophy)Control (management)EngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A nonlinear adaptive trajectory tracking design for autonomous mobile robot and its practical implementation are presented in this paper. This approach can be applied to generate trajectory tracking control commands for autonomous mobile robot tracking predefined trajectories. The design objective is to specify one nonlinear controller with a parameter adaptive law that satisfies the adaptive H 2 optimal performance. In general, it is hard to obtain the closed-form solution from this nonlinear trajectory tracking problem. Fortunately, based on the property of the trajectory tracking error dynamic system of the autonomous mobile robot, one closed-form solution to this problem can be obtained with a very simple form for the preceding control design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.645
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it