MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2785173713 · doi:10.7202/1042987ar

« Croyez surtout pas que j’ai perdu la tête » : quand les lettres d’adieu de suicidés québécois défient les verdicts du coroner

2018· article· fr· W2785173713 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontières · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicSuicide and Self-Harm Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesCoronerArtPhilosophyPoison controlMedicineSuicide preventionMedical emergency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Selon l’OMS, 90 % des suicides sont liés à des problèmes de santé mentale. Or associer le suicide à une altération de l’esprit ne va pas de soi. Au Québec, il est par exemple historiquement aisé de montrer qu’un tel couplage dépasse largement des considérations d’ordre psychiatrique. Sans prendre position davantage dans ce débat, notre analyse de lettres d’adieu part néanmoins du principe que dès lors qu’il y a mise en mots du geste suicidaire, il y a, à travers ce récit, interpellation d’un futur dans lequel l’auteur entend rester acteur de sa vie comme de ce qui la suit. La majorité des lettres de notre corpus rend d’ailleurs explicitement compte des raisons de la mort à venir. Pourtant, dans 91 % des dossiers, le coroner conclut au geste d’un fou. Y compris quand le suicidé précise ne pas l’être.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.168
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it