MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2785924033 · doi:10.1109/pesgm.2017.8273801

A cross-entropy-based control variate method for power system reliability assessment

2017· article· en· W2785924033 on OpenAlexaff
Yi Tang, Wenyuan Li

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Canadian institutionsBC Hydro (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl variatesReliability (semiconductor)Monte Carlo methodComputer scienceRandom variateCombingEntropy (arrow of time)Variance reductionCross entropyConvergence (economics)Reliability engineeringVariance (accounting)Electric power systemAlgorithmMathematicsStatisticsPower (physics)Artificial intelligenceRandom variableEngineeringMarkov chain Monte CarloPrinciple of maximum entropyHybrid Monte Carlo

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper presents a novel non-sequential Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) approach combing the cross-entropy (CE), control variate (CV) and importance sampling (IS) methods to assess the reliability of power system. The basic idea is to select important components that construct a correlated system using the CE method. Because of the strong correlation between the original system and correlated system, the variance of reliability indices for the original system can be reduced by a mixture of CV and IS methods. As a result, the MCS can reach convergence by fewer samples in less time. The Roy Billinton Reliability Test System and IEEE Reliability Test System are used to demonstrate the advantages of the proposed methodology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.434
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering DesignFrench-language works237,207