Construction of wavelets and framelets on a bounded interval
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many problems in applications are defined on a bounded interval. Therefore, wavelets and framelets on a bounded interval are of importance in both theory and application. There is a great deal of effort in the literature on constructing various wavelets on a bounded interval and exploring their applications in areas such as numerical mathematics and signal processing. However, many papers on this topic mainly deal with individual examples which often have many boundary wavelets with complicated structures. In this paper, we shall propose a method for constructing wavelets and framelets in [Formula: see text] from symmetric wavelets and framelets on the real line. The constructed wavelets and framelets in [Formula: see text] often have a few simple boundary wavelets/framelets with the additional flexibility to satisfy various desired boundary conditions. To illustrate our construction method, from several spline refinable vector functions, we present several examples of (bi)orthogonal wavelets and spline tight framelets in [Formula: see text] with very simple boundary wavelets/framelets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it