MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2787106128 · doi:10.1109/taes.2017.2760778

Multipath Maximum Likelihood Probabilistic Multihypothesis Tracker for Low Observable Targets

2017· article· en· W2787106128 on OpenAlexaff
Xu Tang, Qiong Wu, Ratnasingham Tharmarasa, T. Kirubarajan

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsHamilton Health Sciences
FundersChina Postdoctoral Science Foundation
KeywordsMultipath propagationProbabilistic logicComputer scienceRadar trackerMultipath mitigationAlgorithmObservableRadarArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In many practical scenarios with multipath propagation, one target may generate multiple detections in one scan. Proper use of multipath-induced measurements can improve the detection of very low observable (VLO) targets. In this paper, a true multitarget tracker, the joint multipath maximum likelihood probabilistic multihypothesis tracker (JMP-ML-PMHT) is proposed to address this problem. The standard ML-PMHT is extended to incorporate multipath detections and jointly track multiple VLO targets. The Cramer–Rao lower bound with multipath detections is derived. Simulation results with an over-the-horizon-radar scenario show that the JMP-ML-PMHT can detect and track multiple VLO targets by effectively utilizing the information in multipath measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic SystemsSame topicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207