The Impact of Zero Tolerance Policy on Children with Disabilities
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Zero Tolerance policy was intended to eliminate learners who are a danger to a learning institution (Henson,2012). The development of this policy was to assist schools with better policing approaches of students conducts byemploying tough disciplinary action and subsequently provide a safer learning environment. While the ZeroTolerance policy sought to reinforce security measures in schools, the students with emotional or learning disabilitiesand behavioral disorders were predisposed to expulsions and suspensions (Henson, 2012). The situation is facilitatedby the all-encompassing nature of this policy as it fails to accommodate the fact that some of the behaviorsdemonstrated by students with disabilities are beyond their control. While some of these behaviors are considered tofall under the zero-tolerance policy guidelines, it subjects this group of learners several disciplinary actions that werenot initially included in addressing their special needs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it