Modeling Queries with Contextual Snippets for Information Retrieval
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Query expansion under the pseudo-relevance feedback (PRF) framework has been extensively studied in information retrieval. However, most expansion methods are mainly based on the statistics of single terms, which can generate plenty of irrelevant query terms and decrease retrieval performance. To alleviate this problem, we propose an approach that adapts the PRF-based contextual snippets into a context-aware topic model to enhance query representations. Specifically, instead of selecting a series of independent terms, we make full use of the query contextual information and focus on the snippets with the length of n in the PRF documents. Furthermore, we propose a context-aware topic (CAT) model to mine the topic distributions of the query-relevant snippets, namely, fine contextual snippets. In contrast to the traditional topic models that infer the topics from the whole corpus, we establish a bridge between the snippets and the corresponding PRF documents, which can be used for modeling the topics more precisely and efficiently. Finally, the topic distributions of the fine snippets are used for context-aware and topic-sensitive query representations. To evaluate the performance of our approach, we integrate the obtained queries into a topic-based hybrid retrieval model and conduct extensive experiments on various TREC collections. The experimental results show that our query-modeling approach is more effective in boosting retrieval performance compared with the state-of-the-art methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".