MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2789151399 · doi:10.1109/lsp.2018.2799699

AUV-Aided Joint Localization and Time Synchronization for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks

2018· article· en· W2789151399 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Signal Processing Letters · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaResearch and Development Corporation of Newfoundland and Labrador
KeywordsSynchronization (alternating current)Computer scienceUnderwaterScalabilityWireless sensor networkReal-time computingUnderwater acoustic communicationNonlinear systemNetwork packetMeasure (data warehouse)Range (aeronautics)Underwater acousticsControl theory (sociology)TelecommunicationsArtificial intelligenceEngineeringComputer networkGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For the purpose of localization and time synchronization of underwater sensor networks, buoys are generally distributed on the sea surface of the area of interest, serving as fixed anchors. However, this method is not economical and has poor scalability. An alternative is to employ an autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) as a mobile anchor. By receiving the periodical broadcast signals from the AUV, any sensor in the communication range can measure time of arrival of received packets and obtain a series of nonlinear equations. In this letter, we proposed an efficient linear algorithm to solve the nonlinear equations, and gave closed-form positioning and synchronization error analysis. Besides, we show that the proposed method can approach the Cramér-Rao lower bound by both theoretical analysis and simulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score0.694

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it