MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2789299613 · doi:10.1080/02564602.2017.1346488

Joint TAS and Power Allocation for Multiuser M2M Cooperative Networks

2018· article· en· W2789299613 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIETE Technical Review · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Shandong ProvinceChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationPostdoctoral Innovation Project of Shandong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsNakagami distributionComputer scienceFadingJoint (building)Transmitter power outputSelection (genetic algorithm)Monte Carlo methodOutage probabilityPower (physics)Multiuser detectionAntenna (radio)TelecommunicationsComputer networkMathematical optimizationStatisticsMathematicsCode division multiple accessChannel (broadcasting)PhysicsEngineeringTransmitterArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multiuser diversity (MUD) can be exploited in multiuser networks to improve performance. In this paper, the outage probability (OP) of amplify-and-forward relaying multiuser networks with transmit antenna selection (TAS) over N-Nakagami fading channels is investigated. Exact closed-form OP expressions are derived for two TAS schemes. These expressions are used to evaluate the effect of the power allocation on the OP. Monte Carlo simulation is used to verify the analysis. The results show that MUD has a significant effect on the OP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.832
Threshold uncertainty score0.471

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it