RETRACTED ARTICLE: Losing control: Mostly incongruent lists postpone, but do not eliminate, the Stroop effect
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Post-publication record
- Nature
- Retraction
- Reason
- Error in Analyses;Error in Results and/or Conclusions;
- Date
- 8/28/2018 0:00
- Flagged by OpenAlex?
- Yes
Source: Retraction Watch, joined by DOI. OpenAlex records retraction as is_retracted, a boolean over a state space with at least four values, so it cannot express an expression of concern, a correction or a reinstatement — it reports them as false, which reads as “fine”.
Machine scores (provisional)
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
- Teacher spread
- 0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
- Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline· verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
Abstract
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database — OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
The record
- Venue
- Attention Perception & Psychophysics
- Topic
- Memory Processes and Influences
- Field
- Neuroscience
- Canadian institutions
- Dalhousie UniversitySaint Mary's University
- Funders
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Keywords
- Stroop effectPsychologyControl (management)Cognitive psychologyCommunicationSocial psychologyComputer scienceCognitionNeuroscienceArtificial intelligence
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- no