Three-dimensional Printed Surgical Simulator for Kirschner Wire Placement in Hand Fractures
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) of hand fractures can be a deceptively challenging procedure that requires significant hands-on time to teach and learn. We created a realistic three-dimensional simulator that can be used for teaching junior residents the CRPP. Computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) software was used to create a three-dimensional hand model incorporating several common hand fractures: Bennett's fracture, transverse fifth metacarpal neck, and transverse second proximal phalanx. Three-dimensional printing was used to create molds in which the bones and soft tissue were poured. A polyurethane foam was utilized for the bones with iron incorporated to render them radiopaque, whereas silicone of varying viscosities was used for the soft tissues. Five plastic surgery residents and 5 consultants evaluated the model. Individuals then completed an anonymous 12-question survey evaluating the model based on realism, educational utility, and overall usefulness. Survey responses obtained from both residents and consultants were strongly in favor of the simulator. Average realism was graded as 4.48/5 by residents and 4.68/5 by consultants. Average educational utility was graded as 5/5 by residents and 4.95/5 by consultants. Average overall usefulness was graded as 5/5 by both groups. We created an anatomically accurate and realistic simulator for CRPP of hand fractures that was low cost and easily reproducible. Initial feedback was encouraging in regard to realism, educational utility, and overall usefulness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it