MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2790859401

In vitro studies of sex pheromone biosynthesis in the yellow mealworm beetle, Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae)

2000· other· en· W2790859401 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2000
Typeother
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBeetle Biology and Toxicology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMealwormPheromoneSex pheromoneBiologyBiosynthesisZoologyLarvaBotanyBiochemistryGene
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mature female yellow mealworm beetle, 'Tenebrio molitor', uses 4-methylnonanol as a sex attractant pheromone. Data from 'in vivo ' studies suggest that the terminal biosynthetic step, reduction of 4-methylnonanoic acid (or derivative) to 4-methylnonanol, is regulated by Juvenile Hormone (JH) III. The goals of this study were (i) to develop synthetic routes to commercially unavailable substrates and standards required to study the reduction of 4-methylnonanoic acid (or derivative); (ii) to develop an 'in vitro' assay for the reduction of 4-methylnonanoic acid (or derivative) to 4-methylnonanol in the yellow mealworm beetle; (iii) and to confirm that the reduction of 4-methylonanoic acid is regulated by JH. Preliminary results suggest that females and not males are able to perform the conversion. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.711
Threshold uncertainty score0.891

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it