MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2791250395 · doi:10.1080/07373937.2018.1431658

Enhancing drying efficiency and product quality using advanced pretreatments and analytical tools—An overview

2018· article· en· W2791250395 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDrying Technology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersVedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV
KeywordsProcess engineeringRaw materialElectronic noseQuality (philosophy)Environmental scienceFood qualityQuality assuranceComputer scienceProduct (mathematics)Biochemical engineeringPulp and paper industryEngineeringFood scienceChemistryMathematicsArtificial intelligenceOperations management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dry food has the advantages of a convenient storage, long shelf life, and so on, which is widely consumed at present. And there is increased awareness of quality attributes of dehydrated foods such as color, texture, flavor, and nutrient content. In this article, we review several potential pretreatment technologies and analytical tools developed in recent years, which can be used to improve drying efficiency and rapid nondestructive detection. High-pressure processing and ultrasonic treatment can disinfect the wet feedstock before drying. Smart drying with online nondestructive testing using advanced analytical tools such as electronic nose, NMR spectra can help improve product quality in food drying. Each technique has its advantages in the field of food drying. Cost-effectiveness of these modern analytical tools will likely improve with more widespread utilization in industrial practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.142
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it