MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2791777778 · doi:10.1109/tc.2018.2817237

A Stochastic Computational Multi-Layer Perceptron with Backward Propagation

2018· article· en· W2791777778 on OpenAlexaff
Yidong Liu, Siting Liu, Yanzhi Wang, Fabrizio Lombardi, Jie Han

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Computers · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStochastic computingComputer sciencePerceptronArtificial neural networkAlgorithmMultilayer perceptronComputationArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stochastic computation has recently been proposed for implementing artificial neural networks with reduced hardware and power consumption, but at a decreased accuracy and processing speed. Most existing implementations are based on pre-training such that the weights are predetermined for neurons at different layers, thus these implementations lack the ability to update the values of the network parameters. In this paper, a stochastic computational multi-layer perceptron (SC-MLP) is proposed by implementing the backward propagation algorithm for updating the layer weights. Using extended stochastic logic (ESL), a reconfigurable stochastic computational activation unit (SCAU) is designed to implement different types of activation functions such as the tanh and the rectifier function. A triple modular redundancy (TMR) technique is employed for reducing the random fluctuations in stochastic computation. A probability estimator (PE) and a divider based on the TMR and a binary search algorithm are further proposed with progressive precision for reducing the required stochastic sequence length. Therefore, the latency and energy consumption of the SC-MLP are significantly reduced. The simulation results show that the proposed design is capable of implementing both the training and inference processes. For the classification of nonlinearly separable patterns, at a slight loss of accuracy by 1.32-1.34 percent, the proposed design requires only 28.5-30.1 percent of the area and 18.9-23.9 percent of the energy consumption incurred by a design using floating point arithmetic. Compared to a fixed-point implementation, the SC-MLP consumes a smaller area (40.7-45.5 percent) and a lower energy consumption (38.0-51.0 percent) with a similar processing speed and a slight drop of accuracy by 0.15-0.33 percent. The area and the energy consumption of the proposed design is from 80.7-87.1 percent and from 71.9-93.1 percent, respectively, of a binarized neural network (BNN), with a similar accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations111
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on ComputersSame topicNeural Networks and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207