MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2792059393 · doi:10.1109/mpot.2017.2749118

RF Wireless Power Transfer: Regreening Future Networks

2018· article· en· W2792059393 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ha-Vu Tran, Georges Kaddoum

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Potentials · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTelecommunicationsWirelessFootprintPhoneWireless networkBase stationWireless sensor networkEngineeringComputer networkCarbon footprintInformation and Communications TechnologyComputer scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the past few years, green radio communication has drawn much attention from the research community, and it has a strong impact on various aspects, such as telecom businesses, wireless technologies, and natural environments. Specifically, the cost of electricity and CO2emissions have been increasing due to wireless network operation. For instance, the number of base stations (BSs) is more than 4 million, and each BS consumes an average of 25 MWh/year (an estimated approximate of 80% of the total network's power consumption). Bearing in mind the environmental perspective, generating sufficient power to supply the networks causes a significant CO2footprint. Particularly, the overall footprint of information and communication technology (ICT) services (e.g., computer, cell phone, and satellite networks) is predicted to triple by 2020.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.006
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE PotentialsSame topicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless NetworksFrench-language works237,207