Idle Power Loss Suppression in Magnetic Resonance Coupling Wireless Power Transfer
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present a magnetic resonance coupling (MRC) wireless power transfer system that suppresses power losses when operating in an idle state while maintaining high transmission efficiency when operating in an active state. Maximum power can be transferred between transmitting and receiving resonant coils by designing for a simultaneous conjugate match at the source and the load. This match condition, however, leads to high power losses in the transmitting coil when the receiving coil is removed from the system (i.e., when the system is idle). In applications where a device is charged intermittently using a passive charger, the system should be designed by considering power losses in both active and idle states in order to maximize overall system efficiency over time. Here, we show that we can first reduce the idle power losses by introducing mismatch at the transmitter. We can then ensure high active transfer efficiency by introducing a compensating mismatch at the receiver. A four-coil MRC system was built to demonstrate the effectiveness of the idle power loss suppression. By retuning the source and receiver match, the idle power losses were reduced from 38% to 13%, while the active transfer efficiency only dropped from 85% to 76%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it